Sylvain Beucler wrote...

> On 04/06/2026 19:25, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > Quite frankly, I doubt I'm telling anything new here ...
> 
> Indeed:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=908678

Oh boy. I could make some extra waves there if anyone considers this
necessary.

> > .git/objects/pack has 28 Gbytes, and given the current rate this will
> > grow beyond 100 by the end of the year.
> 
> Local delta compression (.pack files) sizes this down drastically, around
> 4-5GB. It's done regularly in the background by default by Git, or through
> 'git gc'.

This I can confirm, the auto-gc brought this down to 5.3G last night.
Aside, that process was also blatantly ignoring the gc.bigPackThreshold
settings, but that's another story.

Still, this is a lot worse than ealier: On April 7th the total size of
.git/objects/ was just 1571M here - a day later things started to go
downhill.

> > What did I miss?
> 
> See the BTS entry above for a discussion.
> Among obstacles: rewriting the Git history (now requires around 2-3 days of
> computing), getting an agreement and official review, adapting the tools.

It's a bit saddening nothing has happened about this while everybody
should have been aware this will not resolve by itself - but rather get
worse over time :(

Data point about history rewriting, there are now 149k commits. If
rewriting a single commit takes just one second, the above number is
sensible.

> Independently, there's also a partial per-CVE rewrite for git-log purposes:
> https://salsa.debian.org/lts-team/cvehist
> (which is another thing to adapt if the tracker repo changes ;))

Whatever improves the situation and assert it's not going to hit again.

    Christoph

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to