FYI:
Le Friday 18 May 2001 19:41, Mark Johnson a �crit : > Eric Bischoff writes: > > Is someone hearing me at all ? ;-) > > I'm still here :-) > > As long as we're talking about the LSB XML/SGML spec... > > While implementing the spec on Debian, we had to depart from the spec > in a few places - mostly directory layout/naming policy. Well, is debian supposed to be LSB-compliant? I don't think so, so no problem ;-). > The most visible differences are directory layouts in /usr/share/sgml/ I know that you Debian guys were attached to your file-type oriented structure (stylesheets vs entities vs dtds etc). The LSB one is a DTD-oriented one (docbook vs html vs tei etc). I'm not too surprised that the result mixes both approaches :-). Personally, I prefer to stick to only one philosophy at once, but of course it's personal taste. > and in /usr/share/sgml/docbook/ ... and that you preferred hierarchies with several levels, while the LSB one is very flat. Again, matter of tastes. > Opinions? Conflicting, but not so far away one with the other. > If possible, we'd like to resolve the conflicts before LSB hits 1.0. :) Oooofff... LSB is very close from 1.0. > P.S. If there's interest, I can create an lsb-xml-sgml mailing list w/ > mailman archives in about 5 minutes. It would be in the duke.edu > domain. (This docbook-tools list rejects many of my messages.) Jorge, do you hear us? Would you agree? -- +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | �ric Bischoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
-- _____________________________________ Mark Johnson Senior Lecturing Fellow 111 Physics Bldg., Box 90305 Department of Physics Duke University Durham, NC 27708-0305 (919) 660-2504 Fax: (919) 660-2525
