On 11/19/24 10:21 AM, MOESSBAUER, Felix wrote: >> I tested the change on lw07, and the location header we see from the >> webapp is fully qualified, so the new proposed patch does not match >> either: >> >>> - RespHeader Location: >>> http://snapshot-lw07.debian.org/file/4c086f4fd3df97030a4e300a43ab3f897d5b15f8 > > That's interesting. The internal redirect seems to work properly for > that host. Then we just need my redirect in addition (e.g. for mlm-01).
Hm, interesting, you are right, it works. >> On lw07 Apache did not fail to process the request. At this point I >> am >> also confused if the machines are set up identically - AIUI at least >> sallinen is configured differently/has different data. > > They are definitely not - as we know by now. Unfortunately not even the > ETags are idendical: > > Package from above: > - snapshot-lw07: 537d00-57f0901818c52 > - snapshot.d.o (cache-fra-etou8220130-FRA): 537d00-57f09017dad00 > > Do we have any machine readable endpoint to get the version of the > snapshot software (e.g. the git commit). I looked at the webapp on lw07 and mlm-01 and both have the same version. It doesn't look like the webapp generates ETags by itself? I don't know where they are coming from. Traditionally from inode numbers, I guess. Not sure how that's supposed to work here. FWIW, you can also interrogate mlm-01 directly, in the same way as lw07. Kind regards Philipp Kern
