Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm not fond of /opt in general, but I agree the alternatives are > > > worse. > > > > Agreed. Another alternative would be to do something like /snap, but > > that isn't provided for under the FHS/FSSTND. > > I'd much prefer /opt to that.
Same here. > > > Perhaps snap-stable-gnome-hello? Or dsp-stable-gnome-hello if you > > > prefer, but it's less immediately obvious. And /opt/snapshots-stable? > > > > That sounds good. How does /opt/snap-stable sound? > > Again, I would probably go for /opt/snapshots-stable...or maybe > /opt/stable? Ok. I can do that (/opt/snapshots-stable). I don't really care about what it's called, but I've got to call it something. :-) > > I think I'll use the snap-stable- prefix on the package names if > > people don't mind. > > Sounds good. Ok, I'll do that as well. I don't think we need the prefix on the source package names. Or do we? Maybe we do, because snap-stable-gnome-libs might be cut from a differenct branch of the CVS than snap-devel-gnome-libs. Cheers, - Jim
