On 16 Mar 2005 01:27:49 +0000
Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> I suspect there is something wrong with the PCI scan of X. Scanpci does
> > >> only list the 66MHz PCI Bus omitting the second bus installed whereas
> > >> lspci sees all of the devices.
> > > There certainly used to be something wrong with it. Check the archives
> > > for around autumn last year (IIRC), there was a patch for handling
> > > scanning the PCI bus.
> > I have seen one message about this but was not able to find out more. where
> > and how would I look for these?
> I think it was relating to running X on SPARC on a 2.6 kernel and was
> around the time 2.6 came out. Which would mean it was some time in
> 2004. Download the archives and grep or google seem like your best
> options.
The PCI device tree names under /proc/bus/pci have changed to the
format of:
/proc/bus/pci/$(PCI_DOMAIN_NUM):$(PCI_BUS_NUM)/
instead of the old:
/proc/bus/pci/$(PCI_BUS_NUM)/
X's device probe has never been fixed to handle this correctly.
It really needs this fix, as X is busted on multiple platforms
with 2.6.x kernels because of this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
