On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 11:20:49AM -0400, Mike Edwards wrote: > Is it all related to spamc's failure to check errors on sockets? spamc > does seem to appear in (nearly?) every case - but if all of this is > happening just because spamc doesn't check for errors correctly, I'd > have to say that this is a major bug somewhere, as one errant process > shouldn't be causing problems like this.
I see the same errors, though I do not have spamc installed. For me, it's mtx. The box is an E450 with slightly less than 500M and a 2.4.30 kernel. A. -- Ansgar Esztermann Researcher & Sysadmin http://www2.thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de/~ansgar
pgpRYXxR5VKE9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
