Juan Cespedes wrote: > > > > version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time > > reference > > > > > > Perhaps you are using the new libc6 with the old libc6-dev? > > > You should use the same version on both libc6 and libc6-dev. > > > > They are the same version. > > > > ii libc6 2.0.90-970928- The GNU C library version 2 (run-time > > files) > > ii libc6-dev 2.0.90-970928- The GNU C library version 2 > > (development fil > > Hmm... I'm afraid that binutils_2.8.1-2.1 will have to be > compiled with the new libc6. I have the same problem with less_332-1 > (well, the undefined symbol was `.div'), and Eric told me that the old > libc6 erroneously linked with some symbols beginning with `.' that > shouldn't be there. > > binutils_2.7.0.9-1, from master, works, AFAIK.
Yes, now it works... at least I'm able to compile "hello world" ;-) thank you -- Davide Barbieri - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sparc Debian) PGP fingerprint = CD 8D A9 1E DB 0C B0 16 F8 2F BF 63 52 49 8B A8 -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
