G'day sparc people, This bug is for whoever does the sparc version of lprng, it is not a generic deb or upstream issue.
----- Forwarded message from Alexandre Vitrac ----- >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 10 16:30:05 1999 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on Solaris X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 08:29:30 +0200 (MET DST) Organization: CS SI Athesa Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Alexandre Vitrac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bug#44685: Dependency problem with LPRng Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sorted: Debian On 10-Sep-99 Craig Small wrote: > Having a quick look at the packages on master and other sites, they all > have the dependency of libncurses4 (with no version, as it should be). > However, I did notice the sparc arch did have versioned dependencies, > are you running a sparc? Yes I'm running a sparc version of Debian GNU/Linux. So there's probably no problem with the archive. How will the problem be solved ? Will there be a new upload of libncurses of a new upload of lprng ? Looking at the BTS I saw that libncurses was upgraded to 3.1 due to problems with glibc2.1 on version 3. And if I'm not mistaken, the sparc port is based on a pre-version of glibc2.1. This is probably why the sparc package for lprng places a dependency on this specific version. ================================== Alexandre Vitrac CS SI ATHESA E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ================================== ----- End of forwarded message from Alexandre Vitrac ----- -- Craig Small VK2XLZ, PGP: AD 8D D8 63 6E BF C3 C7 47 41 B1 A2 1F 46 EC 90 Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIEEE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
