Ben Collins writes: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 12:14:49AM +0100, Richard Mortimer wrote: > > We may be able to scrap the dmfe.c idea and keep with tulip. I did a > > bit of looking into why I was seeing pci errors with the tulip > > driver. After a bit of scratching around and a bit of a helpful > > suggestion from a colleague it seems that the dm9102a chip has a bit > > of a problem with Memory Read Multiple pci transactions (That is CSR0 > > bit 21). If the MRM bit is cleared the pci errors go away and the chip > > starts to act a bit more reasonably. > > This sounds an awful lot like the problems I am having with tulip on my > g4, so it may not be an X1 issue. I had to back down to a version from > around 2.4.[34]. Maybe you could try copying the tulip directory from > that kernel version to 2.4.7, apply your patch and see how that works?
I tried that and got the same result. Do you think it might be worth trying 2.4.[34] on the X1 (with hand crafted patches to get the machine to run at all?). Richard -- Richard Mortimer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] dot netscapeonline dot co dot uk