"Tille, Andreas" wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Andrew Sharp wrote: > > > Excellent, so you have a work around ~:^) Seriously, the kernel > > version will only give you better performance (depending on what the > > processor is), and who really needs that? > Performance and security. Well NFS is insecure anyway and I'm sitting > behind a firewall, but ...
When I said "Seriously" I was being facetious. > > Anyway, this sounds like > > it could be something as silly as the whitespace character(s) used. > > Can you test for certain what they are on the three lines? Because > > it seems like the the second two lines are working, soooooo maybe > > you used a tab or two when the kernel server only likes spaces or > > something silly like that. > The lines are formated equally all with spaces (0x20). And I have to > say that I did many many experiments with those lines. After deleting > the broken line one other took its place. It's not that easy. :-((( Sounds like maybe something is wrong with the preceding lines. How about deleting all the comment lines before hand. Or adding one. Mine looks like this: benedict:/usr/share/kernel-package# cat /etc/exports # /etc/exports: the access control list for filesystems which may be exported # to NFS clients. See exports(5). / 10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0(rw,no_root_squash) benedict:/usr/share/kernel-package# a