Dave, I've compiled many times 2.4.19 with 3.1 cross-compiled for sparc64-linux and so far had had no problem (except not being able to compile framebuffer support).
Should I continue using it (if it ain't broke, don't fix it) or should I compile egcs64? Thanks, IvanK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ivan]$ /usr/sparc64-linux/bin/sparc64-linux-gcc --version sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 3.1 Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. On Wednesday 02 October 2002 07:48 pm, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Roy Bixler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:44:46 -0500 > > Any suggestions for getting 2.5.x kernels running are appreicated. > Otherwise, I'll have to try your patches on a 2.4 kernel. > > Don't use gcc-3.2 to build the kernel. It has known problems. > > Take the egcs64 package from the stable debian release and > use that. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
