On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Dave Paton wrote: > On 2/10/03 at 3:23 PM, Peter Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 10 Feb 2003, andy bezella wrote: > > <mucho snippola> > > > The box isn't going to be stable without a lot of involved kernel work > > that nobody quite understands, and nobody really has time to do. You're > > pretty much 100% screwed. > > So I guess a guy like me with one of the freak dual hypersparc 170s is up the > creek without a boat?
No, ss5/170 is a turbosparc; the hypersparc is an entirely different beast, and it's not in a sparcstation 5 ever. We're *only* talking about the sparcstation 5/170, not any other ss5 and not any other 170MHz cpu. Just TurboSPARC. -- Peter What we need is either less corruption, or more chances to participate in it.