On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 06:56:25 -0500 Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, this is the information I needed. I would've thought a sb1000 > would've been considerably zippier than a 3-year old Pentium3 machine, > but what I'm hearing you say is that may not necessarily be the case. What exactly do you want to "go fast" on this sb1000 machine? What metrics are you using to determine whether the thing you desire to use this box for is going "fast" or "slow"? These are the kinds of things you should have been saying in your initial posting, instead of saying vague things...