On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 03:51:45PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:17:27 +0400, > Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Package: libc6-sparc64 > > > > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-13 > > > > > > > > Package libc6-sparc64 has no reason to depend on lib64gcc1. None of > > > > libraries provided by libc6-sparc64 are linked agains this library. > > > > > > The problem is they don't need to be installed on sparc environment > > > always. > > > > I can't understang how that's related to depending on lib64gcc1. > > > > None of libc6 packages on other architectures depends on libgcc packages. > > And libc6-s390x on s390 does not depend on lib64gcc1. > > > > There is no reason for libc6 to depend on libgcc. > > Then is it safe to remove dependency? If some userland application > need to use lib64gcc1, user has to install it manually? debian-sparc > guys, BenC, is it OK? Nikita, please ask to debian-sparc guys instead > of me.
It should be fine. libgcc1 gets pulled in by proper shlibdeps, so lib64gcc1 should do the same. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/