Mr. Smakov, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ls /proc/bus/pci 0000:00 0000:01 0000:02 devices [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#
It appears that this patch will be ineffective for my problem if I understand properly what it is doing. --- Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Ron Murray wrote: > > > Colour me doubtful about this as a fix. Its bug report has an > XFree86.log > > that actually appears to scan the PCI bus, then does lots of other > things > > before reporting "no screens found". In contrast, both the logs > from the > > originator of this thread and the XFree86.log in bug #280384 show > the crash > > occurring immediately after loading the pcidata module, with no > attempt to > > scan the PCI bus. That is also my experience, as evidenced by the > log in my > > own post to bug #280384. They don't look like the same problem to > me at all. > > Hi, > > I have looked more carefully at bug 279436. The fix which Branden > Robinson > referred to was supposed to take care of the problem on sparc64 when > the > machine does not have a PCI bus numbered zero. Can those who > experienced > the crashes please post the contents of their /proc/bus/pci > directory? If > it looks like this: > > $ ls /proc/bus/pci/ > 40/ 60/ 80/ 81/ devices > > i.e. there is no '00' entry, then there is hope, that the patch will > actually do something useful. If there is a '00' entry, then we are > looking at a completely different problem. > > Best regards, > > Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >