Am Dienstag, 26. Juli 2005 02:26 schrieb Frans Pop: > On Tuesday 26 July 2005 02:12, Jon Biddell wrote: > > All I'm saying, for what its worth, is that there are some people for > > whom their old sparc32 is perfectly functional... > > Yes, but without people putting in the time and effort to get the (2.6) > kernel properly supported on sparc32, it's still a no-go.
I remember that I ran 2.6.x on my SS20 (one cpu only) but went back to 2.4.xx to also use the second cpu. > You might want to read this bug report (ignore the flames) [1] for > reference. That's about memory requirements, my SS20 has 512MB RAM (I really hope that this is sufficient ;) What's in the initrd that it requires >48MB? Should be only core stuff for booting (accessing hard drive or net), nothing else. HS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]