On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:51:45 -0800 (PST), Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for your offer. As the future of the sparc32 port is uncertain at > best, the machines must most certainly be sparc64.
Ouch - I use Sparc32 myself. If Sparc32 was ok, I could possibly provide access to such a box. The company I work for is, among other things, a local ISP, so we have plenty of bandwidth. Most of our hardware is AMD/Intel, but we do have some Sparc systems that I could possibly make available. Regards, Ozz.
pgpQowCe0Dupy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
