On 2010-03-31, Chris Liddell wrote: > I had the same problem on my Blade 1000, and Jurij kindly pointed my at > the solution, so I'll quote: > > "This is a known problem. Kernel 2.6.30 incorrectly reported machine > type to the installer, so SILO was installing incorrect bootloader > (intended for 32-bit machines) during the installation, causing this > boot failure. See the following message: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570264#10 > > which includes a workaround for it. It will get fixed automatically > once we get newer kernel for the installer images, daily images might > already have 2.6.32, which should work out of the box."
I just installed using this (March 22) netinst iso on my Ultra 5 and SILO booted successfully. http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/sparc/iso-cd/ It uses kernel 2.6.32-3-sparc64. I guess my previous response about warm booting after Solaris 10 was a red herring. Regards, Howard E. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/bcrd87-0ti....@gonif.dnyndns.org