Dear Frans Frans van Berckel wrote, on 03/04/2011 12:54 PM: > On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 20:43 -0500, Ivan Jager wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 05:40:05PM +0100, Adrian Zaugg scribbled: >>> If it is correct, that /usr/lib64 must be a symlink to /usr/lib, which >>> package is responsible for creating this link? Or is debootstrap >>> responsible for this? >> On my systems, /usr/lib64 and /usr/lib are separate directories. > > So we are using natively 32 bit lib's in openjdk-6 on sparc64 now? And
To make it clear: I compiled for sparc64 not for sparc with a 64bit kernel. I'm talking of sparc64 as described in the Debian wiki http://wiki.debian.org/Sparc64. As far as I know, sparc64 is a pure 64bit distribution. If I do check the libraries installed, they are all 64bit (using file command to check), none are 32bit. Therefore I do see it as a mistake if /lib64 resp. /usr/lib64 are not symlinked to the lib directories. > how did they solve this on PowerPC 32/64? Or other 64 bit architectures. On my AMD64 Debian /usr/lib and /lib do only contain 64bit libraries, lib64 is linked to the lib directories. Regards, Adrian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d710bb2.60...@ente.limmat.ch