On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Jurij Smakov <ju...@wooyd.org> wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 01:50:04PM +0200, Artyom Tarasenko wrote: >> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Josip Rodin <j...@entuzijast.net> wrote: >> > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:19:48PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> >> Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of >> >> http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be appreciated, >> >> as would any other information you think is relevant to helping us >> >> determine sparc's status for the release. >> > >> > I see the number of registered sparc porters has dropped since the last >> > time >> > around and we're now in the red, but I don't think that's because of an >> > actual change, rather we must have done different accounting. >> > >> > upstream and downstream, the situation seems unchanged - stuff is generally >> > working fine, I don't see a particular reason to avoid releasing sparc >> > wheezy compared to sparc squeeze. >> >> And if debian-sparc would include the virtio drivers, it might even >> get more porters, >> as they would be able to develop stuff and do some initial testing >> without having >> an access to sun4u hardware. [1] ;-) >> >> 1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2012/05/msg00014.html > > File a wishlist bug against linux-2.6 package asking to enable > virtio-modules udeb for sparc. We have them for other architectures, > if there any particular reason why they are not available for sparc, > kernel team will explain it to us.
Done. Bug#673320 -- Regards, Artyom Tarasenko Solaris/sparc and Linux/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/search/label/qemu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cacxas8bcwwxwut-cb_+un5o7x5g5plxyyonawuvhon4dwvt...@mail.gmail.com