I have a dual US-III in a Sun Blade 2500 running 3.9 and it's stable for me, but I don't recall having any problems with 3.2 either.
Patrick On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 4:38 PM, BERTRAND Joël <joel.bertr...@systella.fr>wrote: > Andreas Barth a écrit : > > Hi, >> >> today I tried to resurrect our buildd on schroeder (which is from >> architecture sparc). While trying to do so, I had a couple of strange >> behaviours like vi freezing after 20-30 seconds, or I couldn't about >> tail with ctrl+c or suspend with ctrl+z. This didn't change after a >> reboot. Machine was running our official 3.2-kernel. >> >> After Martin rebooted the machine into oldstables 2.6.32 kernel, >> things are working as they should, and the buildd is up again. >> >> Question: Is this a known issue? How can we get a fix for that? (I >> would assume DSA will consider it a non-option to not be able to >> upgrade to our default kernels.) >> > > Hello, > > I have seen same freezes on Blade 2000 (2 * US III+/900 Cu), on U5 > (US IIi/440), but not on a server that run with four US IIIi and not on a > T1000 (sun4v/US T1). I have tested 3.2 debian kernels and official ones and > both hang. I suppose there is another strange bug with special MMU. 2.6.32 > is stable but on sparc64, 3.2 is not. I have not tested newer kernels. > > Regards, > > JKB > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to > debian-sparc-REQUEST@lists.**debian.org<debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > http://lists.debian.org/**51abbb4f.5010...@systella.fr<http://lists.debian.org/51abbb4f.5010...@systella.fr> > >
