On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:59:26AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > On 10/02/2013 09:45, Niels Thykier wrote: > > Summary table: > > Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total > > ---------------++-----++---------++-------++------ > [...] > > sparc[2] || 1 || 0 || 0 || 1 > > > > [2] By the looks of it, if sparc was replaced by sparc64, we could be > > looking at 3 in the "Other"-column rather than 0. > > In addition gcc no longer supports 32bit sparc according to the > architecture qualification notes for Squeeze[1] and Wheezy[2].
I would still like to see some proofs of this claim, as already asked multiple times. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131003204018.gb17...@ohm.rr44.fr
