On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=y and CONFIG_SERIAL_PMACZILOG=n
Why is CONFIG_SERIAL_PMACZILOG to be disabled? And why was CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK disabled? > I think we need to file bugs in the BTS for each of these instances in > the future, instead of trying to communicate with the maintainers > directly. Sure, if the BTS process would help avoid these mistakes. But I don't see how it can help when it is downstream of the kernel developers. Finn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.LNX.2.00.1312232231090.18343@nippy.intranet
