On 17 August 2015 at 18:48, Artyom Tarasenko <atar4q...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Knut Petter, > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Knut Petter Ølberg <kpolb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On 9 August 2015 at 00:22, Sam Ravnborg <s...@ravnborg.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Artyom > >> > >> > I think the kernel is going to need this patch: > >> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2015/08/msg00014.html > >> This patch does not fix any real bug - it is a cosmetic issue. > >> > >> I assume you wanted to point out the FPU fix: > >> "sparc64: Fix userspace FPU register corruptions" > >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2015/08/msg00012.html > >> > >> Sam > > > > Hi, > > > > Sorry about my late reply. > > No worries here. I think the most people in this thread don't have > much time for debian-sparc anyways. :-) > > > I mistakenly said T5120 when it's actually is a > > T5140. Not sure if this makes any difference? > > No difference, it's a sun4v machine too and the FPU register > corruption fix is still required. > https://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2015/08/msg00012.html > > > Anyways, just let me know what you need and I'll set it up. > > Since we identified that the udev (systemd) problems are caused by a > "gold" linker, the next steps are > build current binutils and check whether the situation is improved. > > And if it's not, patch a systemd package to use the "bfd" linker > instead of "gold". > > Artyom > > -- > Regards, > Artyom Tarasenko > > SPARC and PPC PReP under qemu blog: > http://tyom.blogspot.com/search/label/qemu > So until this is fixed, the ldom would be of no use as a build machine? -kp
