Hi Rod, Don’t worry; those are all down to me (a kernel module to dump vmap_lazy_nr and friends, and the DEBUG ones are because I added a printk to see if a particular condition is reached). Then of course the tst_qtgraphical segfault is just a normal user-space SIGSEGV.
I’m curious as to whether raverin actually needed rebooting; my monitoring tool says it was still up 7 minutes ago, but not 2 minutes later at the next refresh (presumably because you’ve rebooted). Being idle is expected; there are no packages queued for building. Thanks, James > On 31 Oct 2016, at 14:12, rod <r.schn...@mythos.freeddns.org> wrote: > > Good morning, > > I saw ravirin was not building again so in the process of rebooting him > I found this snipet. > > [ 1208.832559] vln_init: lazy_max_pages() is 4096 > [ 1208.918323] vln_init: vmap_lazy_nr is caeb1c > [ 1208.974405] vln_init: *vmap_lazy_nr is 145 > [ 1209.030340] vln_init: lazy_max_pages() is 4096 > [ 1209.294257] vln_init: vmap_lazy_nr is caeb1c > [ 1209.350412] vln_init: *vmap_lazy_nr is 174 > [ 1209.406334] vln_init: lazy_max_pages() is 4096 > [ 1209.834246] vln_init: vmap_lazy_nr is caeb1c > [ 1209.890347] vln_init: *vmap_lazy_nr is 203 > [ 1209.946274] vln_init: lazy_max_pages() is 4096 > [ 1210.553105] vln_init: vmap_lazy_nr is caeb1c > [ 1210.609279] vln_init: *vmap_lazy_nr is 232 > [ 1210.665157] vln_init: lazy_max_pages() is 4096 > [ 1211.349159] vln_init: vmap_lazy_nr is caeb1c > [ 1211.405310] vln_init: *vmap_lazy_nr is 261 > [ 1211.461203] vln_init: lazy_max_pages() is 4096 > [24537.258928] TSB[kworker/0:5:5958]: DEBUG flush_tsb_kernel_range > start=000000001000c000 end=00000000f0000000 PAGE_SIZE=2000 > [24537.404378] TSB[kworker/0:5:5958]: DEBUG flush_tsb_kernel_range > start=0000000100000000 end=00000001020d6000 PAGE_SIZE=2000 > [217632.451540] TSB[kworker/0:1:17055]: DEBUG flush_tsb_kernel_range > start=0000000100004000 end=0000000102126000 PAGE_SIZE=2000 > [230284.512421] tst_qtgraphical[476]: segfault at 0 ip fff00001013e8644 > (rpc fff0000100841884) sp 000007feffc275e1 error 30001 in > libc-2.24.so[fff000010135c000+15e000] > > Not sure what it means nor what I can do to help fix it. Thoughts. > > Rod > > > On 10/27/2016 7:07 AM, James Clarke wrote: >> Hi Rod, >> It seems ravirin has been down for at least the past few days. Could you >> please >> give it some love? If it’s crashed/hung with CPU lockups, I’ve built a 4.9 >> kernel with a patch to fix this which I’d like to test. >> >> Thanks, >> James >>