Hi
(restricting to debian-sparc)
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
That's great to hear. If you want, you can add your
Tested-by: Riccardo Mottola<[email protected]> # on Sun Fire
T-2000
Sorry, I am not sure I tested the proper kernel? in any case now you
"overwrote" the first kernel.
-rw-r--r-- 1 multix users 42142648 Aug 28 16:34
linux-image-6.12.3-sparc64-smp_6.12.3-1+sparc64_sparc64.deb
-rw-r--r-- 1 multix users 48755288 Sep 8 23:53
linux-image-6.12+unreleased-sparc64-smp_6.12.43-1+nothp1_sparc64.deb
The one that worked for me is 6.12.3 - I too wondered about the version
number the other day, is it correct? Does it make sense to report his
version?
In case I boot it again and check
The second one is the broken one I reported today.
The kernel I am running currently:
uname -a
Linux narya 6.12.38+deb13-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Debian 6.12.38-1
(2025-07-16) sparc64 GNU/Linux
is usably stable, survives boots, compilations and allows the system to
be useful. However it has scary warnings in dmesg, e.g.:
[ 37.713203] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[8f89dc]
aa_dfa_unpack+0x3c/0x5c0
[ 37.713272] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[8f89f0]
aa_dfa_unpack+0x50/0x5c0
[ 37.713312] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[8f8a8c]
aa_dfa_unpack+0xec/0x5c0
[ 37.713355] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[8f8a8c]
aa_dfa_unpack+0xec/0x5c0
[ 37.713399] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[8f8a8c]
aa_dfa_unpack+0xec/0x5c0
and things like traces on CPU 28.... well I have other 31 CPUs :-P at
least "cores" it is actually 8 CPU x 4 cores but they all identify the same-
Riccardo
