Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 01:24:24PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > Woody sucks because it still contains "real" ssh-nonfree packages. > > Sorry, I can't find any reason at all to have "ssh-nonfree" install the > free OpenSSH on you. That has absolutely *no* logic to me. And people > who're running it have already demonstrated their ability to cope with > installing a package by hand rather than just doing a dist-upgrade and > living with the results, so there doesn't seem any need to baby them.
Fair enough. > So ssh-nonfree will disappear shortly from testing, and IMO should > disappear entirely. There's really no need for a "transition" here. OK, thanks; that's still a definite improvement over leaving things as is. I'll go ahead and file a bug on non-us.d.o requesting ssh-nonfree's removal from unstable; I had been holding back only so that the transitional packages would still be around if needed. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
