Alan's 2.0.37pre-10 patch contains 5.1.13 (my 2.2.6 from patches appears to have 5.1.10 - ???).
Bob On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 02:56:26PM +0200, Karl B. Hammar wrote: > > > I resently did an install on an Transtac box, with a double aic7xxx > > something on the motherboard. The 2.0.36 kernel based resc.disc did fail, > > but when I put a vanilla 2.2.4 kernel on the resc.disc it did succed and I > > could finish the install. Also the SuSE made kernel based on 2.0.36 also > > worked. > > I'm still waiting for a user here to tell me if the rescue disks I gave him > worked or not. I know 2.2.x doesn't have this problems (2.2.5 contains aic > drivers 5.1.13) but the problem is we can't use 2.2.x on the rescue floppy. > I tried several solutions: one is using a newer aic driver (5.1.15, 2.0.36 > on the rescue floppy from 3/3 contains 5.1.11, IIRC), another one is using a > SuSE-like approach (like Slackware, they have tons of kernels compiled). RH > doesn't have these problems because they use a totally different solution, > namely, an initial ramdisk from where modules are loaded _after_ the kernel > boots. > > > So whatever didn't work on 2.0.36 is fixed with 2.2.4 for this > > motherboard, and also SuSE made something work for 2.0.36. > > Would someone take a look at their kernel sources? I had a few problems > installing 5.1.15 over a debianized kernel source for 2.0.36 (2.0.36-3), > because there are some other SCSI patches already applied (MCA SCSI I > recall, but that wasn't a really problem) > > > Fetch patch in e.g. ftp://ftp.uk.kernel.org > > /pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.0.37pre/2.0.37/2.0.37-pre-patch-9.bz2, > > and a vanilla 2.0.36 kernel (I have not tested it against debian's 2.0.36), > > in /pub/linux/kernel/linux-2.0.36.tar.gz > > I also did this. It's using aic drivers 5.1.13, I _think_ (/me has lousy > memory), but I guess it's not going to be that easy to convince Richard to > let in a different kernel for slink. > > Asking arround I found a few more machines with 788x's on them... this is > going to sound stupid, but I better ask anyway. The funny thing with these > machines is they _do_ have onboard 788x's but they don't have _any_ SCSI > device attached. Would the precense of the host adapter alone trigger the > problem? I have to talk the people in charge of these boxes into "letting me > power cycle them just to test a boot floppy -- it'll be a just few minutes > downtime... promise!", but I don't want to find out the boot floppies work > just because nothing is attached to the adapters... > > > Marcelo > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ---- Bob Nielsen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tucson, AZ AMPRnet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DM42nh http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
