Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is vfat included in the things fixed in 2.2.4? I thought it was just mv > and cp.
I don't believe so. Please interact with the kernel maintainer, aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] We do *not* maintain kernel images. When we have problems with the kernel images, we file bugs on it just like anyone. > >Yeah -- that's a kernel issue -- not much we can do.... > Except document it. Several of my concerns centered on knowing exactly > what types of partitions (e.g., vfat, ntfs) should be readable or writable > at the different installation stages. Well -- sure. You could file a wishlist bug for this. It varies by architecture. > I believe the relevant packages are apt and dselect, not the target > packages that were indicated as broken. > What I was trying to do was definitely non-standard. If I run through an > install again I can indicate more precisely what if any problems remain, > and how to reproduce them. Right now I'd say my report is mostly a > heads-up that it might be worth testing this area a bit more. Ok -- good that we CC'd debian-testing then. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
