Anthony Towns <[email protected]> writes: > Which is entirely reasonable, but not much of a justification for messages > entitled ``Gnome totally broke'' and declaring that ``testing is once > again thoroughly hosed''. Is a little decorum too much to ask?
"Totally broke" means "I did a straightforward upgrade, and apt produced unfixable errors, and gnome didn't function until I fetched newer packages from sid and installed those". "Once again" means "Every single time there has been a big chunk of changes in testing, the upgrade proceeds very painfully." > You seem to be mistaking `testing' for `stable'. It's not. The goals > of stable are significantly stricter than the goals of testing. I'm comparing testing with *unstable*, and it's coming out the loser. It should be more stable than sid, or there's no point at all. Thomas
