Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > AFAICT, why are neither sawfish nor sawmill in woody? The maintainer > > (Christian Marillat) is being uncommunicative. > > Isn't it time that you figured out how testing works? Have a look at > > http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/
I didn't sit down one day and say "I'll run stable." Instead, the procedure for maintaining *woody* was changed, radically. This was a crazily foolish mistake to have made. But that's water under the bridge; it's way too late to fix it now. So instead of assuming that I've ignored the obvious sources of information, why not actually help answer the question? I checked update_excuses. It says: sawfish 0.38-6 (new) (optional) (low) Maintainer: Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sawfish uploaded 53 days ago, out of date by 43 days! valid candidate (will be installed unless it's dependent upon other buggy pkgs) So: what does "out of date" mean? Is it actually dependent on buggy packages, or is there some other problem? Is "out of date" a problem?
