On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 04:45:58 +1100
Andy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 18:10:17 +0100
> Holger Paschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > will perhaps go for the version, I have on woody-CDs, I bought a month
> > ago. But I don't know, if that will break some dependencies... thus
> > requiring further downgrading of other parts.
>
> As far as other dependencies go, the packages on my system (mostly latest
> sid) happily coexist. The dependencies (between the packages I have
> installed, anyway) are...
[snip]
> ...and you can see there are no versioned dependencies. Your CD version may
> well be OK.
Bleeaargh! Broken script (that generated that list)! The compilers have
versioned dependencies, which are (for me)...
gcc-3.0 (3.0.3-0pre011215) requires binutils (>=2.11.92.0.10)
gcc-2.95 (2.95.4-0.011006) requires binutils (>=2.11.90.0.1-1)
Andy
