Michael Stone wrote: > So it's better for the user to get an inderminate file? File conflicts > are always serious bugs (nothing to do with bts) that could very easily > break something. This gets worse as we encourage people to use > third-party apt sources; if force-overwrite is turned on it's trivial to > accidentally screw things up. When is it not good to alert the user to a > potenially disastrous, abnormal situation?
This certianly sounds dreadful and all, but it didn't seem to cause any problems in practice in potato, hamm, rexx, or bo. -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
