Hi,

I tried to compile version 0.9.0rc7-2 of alsa-source with make-kpkg, but I 
didn't expect this result :

## Using kernel-package_8.020_all.deb

keats:/usr/src/linux# make menuconfig
keats:/usr/src/linux# MODULE_LOC="~/modules"
keats:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg clean
..
..

keats:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg --revision=keats+1.4 kernel_image
..
..
..
..
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.20/Documentation/DocBook'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.20'
rm -f stamp-build
touch stamp-image
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.20'

## So it builds correctly

keats:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg --revision=keats+1.4 modules_image
for module in  ; do                        \
          if test -d  $module; then                                \
    (cd $module;                                           \
              if ./debian/rules KVERS="2.4.20" KSRC="/usr/src/linux" \
                             KMAINT="Dimitri Chausson" KEMAIL="[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]"      \
                             KDREV="keats+1.4" kdist_image; then    \
                  echo "Module $module processed fine";            \
              else                                                  \
                   echo "Module $module failed.";                  \
                   echo "Hit return to Continue";                   \
           read ans;                                        \
              fi;                                                   \
     );                                                     \
  fi;                                                       \
        done

## Don't know why it doesn't do anything here
## If I move ~/modules to /usr/src/, it processes but just produce a file 
alsa-modules-2.4.20_0.9.0rc7-2_i386.deb (without my local version number) in 
/usr/src/modules instead of alsa-modules-2.4.20_0.9.0rc7-2+keats+1.4_i386.deb 
in /usr/src
## Am I setting the MODULE_LOC environment variable the wrong way ??

Maybe some of you can tell me where the problem is.

Thanks,

Dimitri

Reply via email to