Hallo Liste,

Am Mittwoch 26 Januar 2005 00:20 schrieb Gerhard Gaußling:
> Es könnte natürlich auch sein, da ich mit einer dialup-Verbindung ins
> Internet gehe, dass der Zielhost sich geändert hat, und der open
> relay garnicht mehr mein Rechner war. Ich hatte allerdings den
> Rechner eine Zeitland davon abgehalten offline zu gehen. Aber ich
> bemerkte die mail von abuse.net erst später im Spam-Filter von
> web.de. Deshalb ist das nicht ganz auszuschließen.

Das scheint der Fall gewesen zu sein.
Dank des Tips von Christian konnte ich das nochmals testen:

[Begin Test 1-6]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/gerhard# exim -bh 213.6.40.150

**** SMTP testing session as if from host 213.6.40.150
**** Not for real!

>>> host in host_lookup? yes (*)
>>> looking up host name for 213.6.40.150
>>> IP address lookup yielded a2896.a.pppool.de
>>> host in host_reject? no (option unset)
>>> host in host_reject_recipients? no (option unset)
>>> host in rbl_hosts? yes (0.0.0.0/0)
>>> checking RBL domain blackholes.mail-abuse.org/reject
>>> RBL lookup for 150.40.6.213.blackholes.mail-abuse.org failed
>>> => that means it's not black listed at blackholes.mail-abuse
>>> checking RBL domain dialups.mail-abuse.org/reject
>>> RBL lookup for 150.40.6.213.dialups.mail-abuse.org failed
>>> => that means it's not black listed at dialups.mail-abuse.or
>>> checking RBL domain relays.mail-abuse.org/warn
>>> RBL lookup for 150.40.6.213.relays.mail-abuse.org failed
>>> => that means it's not black listed at relays.mail-abuse.org
>>> checking RBL domain rbl.mail-abuse.org/reject
>>> RBL lookup for 150.40.6.213.rbl.mail-abuse.org failed
>>> => that means it's not black listed at rbl.mail-abuse.org
>>> host in auth_hosts? no (option unset)
>>> host in sender_unqualified_hosts? no (option unset)
>>> host in receiver_unqualified_hosts? no (option unset)
>>> host in helo_verify? no (option unset)
>>> host in helo_accept_junk_hosts? no (option unset)
220 debian ESMTP Exim 3.36 #1 Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:43:59 +0100
HELO a2896.a.pppool.de
250 debian Hello a2896.a.pppool.de [213.6.40.150]
RSET
[...]
550 relaying to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> prohibited by administrator
LOG: refused relay (host) to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> H=a2896.a.pppool.de [213.6.40.150]
RSET
[...]
550 relaying to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> prohibited by administrator
LOG: refused relay (host) to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from <> 
H=a2896.a.pppool.de [213.6.40.150]
RSET
250 Reset OK
[...]
550 relaying to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> prohibited by administrator
LOG: refused relay (host) to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> H=a2896.a.pppool.de [213.6.40.150]
RSET
250 Reset OK
[...]
550 relaying to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> prohibited by administrator
LOG: refused relay (host) to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> H=a2896.a.pppool.de [213.6.40.150]
RSET
250 Reset OK
[...]
>>> host in ignore_fromline_hosts? no (option unset)
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] in [EMAIL PROTECTED] no (end of list)
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] in [EMAIL PROTECTED] yes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] in [EMAIL PROTECTED] no (end of list)
.
LOG: 1Ctv2t-0004H7-00 <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] H=a2896.a.pppool.de 
[213.6.40.150] P=smtp S=778
250 OK id=1Ctv2t-0004H7-00

**** SMTP testing: that is not a real message id!
[End Tests 1-6]


Ich habe die 6 Tests von abuse.net hier angewendet. Der exim scheint 
also dicht zu sein.

Viellen Dank an alle, und sorry für die falsche url.

ciao

Gerhard 

Antwort per Email an