Oi Lucas,
| umask 000 e igual ao chmod 777
|
| Em Seg, 2009-12-28 `as 13:35 -0300, Lucas Salies Brum escreveu:
|
| Nao Leslie, umask e diferente de chmod.
Sim, disso eu sei :D
umask() sets the calling process’s file mode creation mask (umask)
to mask & 0777 (i.e., only the file permission bits of mask are
used), and returns the previ‐
ous value of the mask.
| umask 000 e igual ao chmod 777, ou seja -rwxrwxrwx
| Entendeu?
|
|
http://www.vivaolinux.com.br/artigo/Entendendo-os-tipos-de-permissoes/?pagina=5
|
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/understanding-linux-unix-umask-value-usage.html
| http://www.dartmouth.edu/~rc/help/faq/permissions.html
|
| Agora eu nao sei se esse mask do Samba se refere ao umask ou chmod.
hmmm, acredito que eu tenha entendido mal a tua afirmativa, mas pra mim
mask = máscara de criação de arquivos (chmod) e
umask = mascara & 0777
De qualquer maneira, olhando o man do smb.conf
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
create mask (S)
When a file is created, the necessary permissions are calculated
according to the mapping from DOS modes to UNIX permissions, and the resulting
UNIX mode is
then bit-wise ´AND´ed with this parameter. This parameter may be
thought of as a bit-wise MASK for the UNIX modes of a file. Any bit not set
here will be
removed from the modes set on a file when it is created.
The default value of this parameter removes the group and other
write and execute bits from the UNIX modes.
Following this Samba will bit-wise ´OR´ the UNIX mode created from
this parameter with the value of the force create mode parameter which is set
to 000 by
default.
This parameter does not affect directory masks. See the parameter
directory mask for details.
Note that this parameter does not apply to permissions set by
Windows NT/2000 ACL editors. If the administrator wishes to enforce a mask on
access control
lists also, they need to set the security mask.
Default: create mask = 0744
Example: create mask = 0775
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atenção para o segundo parágrafo (the default value), que dá a dica que não é
um Umask e sim a máscara de criação do chmod.
Mas acredito que isso pouco tenha a ver com o problema que iniciou a thread.
Att,
LEslie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
