> > On Sat, 2002-07-27 at 09:18, Henrique de Moraes > > Holschuh wrote: > > > On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, synthespian wrote: > > > > Please help me sort out if this is a feature or > > a bug in the apt-spy > > > > package: when you run it, it'll override your > > previous checklist. > > > > > > That's not good... (snip) > > > IMHO it is a bug, but not a major one, since the > > package proposes to do > > > exactly that. You could file a wishlist bug > > requesting apt-spy to never > > > remove URLs from sources.list, (snip) > > > > When I have some time, I will file that bug > > (probably this weekend). > > But I have question: in the case people decide this > > isn't a Good Thing > > (overriding the whole of the old sources.list), > > shouldn't there be a > > different format for the sources.list, so that it > > could be properly > > parsed (like adding a new tag, or something), > > leaving out the stuff we > > don't want to be thrown away (for instance, I have > > some Common Lisp and > > R stuff). > > > > Regs, > > > > synthespian > > But doesn't apt-spy save a copy of your previous > sources.list or is that not the issue here? Sorry if > this has already been addressed but I just got in on > the thread. > > ===== > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Rascharles --- Well, not really, because you have to keep pasting the old stuff in the new sources.list generated by apt-spy. So it is a nuisance if you have different stuff (like CMUCL, sources for things, or R, for example). synthespian