On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 04:10, jfcarvajal wrote: > > >>Can you define "for a while" and "a little longer"? Are these 1 hour, 10 > >> minutes, 5 seconds at maybe four frames a second? > > "for a while" : aprox 15 seconds > "a little longer": aprox 45 seconds > Yes, about four frames per second > > Besides the quickcam I have a USB epson scanner that works properly. ... > Though I haven't tested it while the gqcam program is hanged. I'll try that > this afternoon. > > Cheers > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
Okay, remind me - can that model be used as a roving digital camera, with the images then downloaded into a computer when it is reconnected? If so, it sounds like it is taking individual images, putting them each in a separate slot in the camera's memory, and when it runs out of that memory, it can no longer answer the grabbing function of xawtv or gqcam. It *shouldn't* really be running that way when functioning as a video camera, but I haven't seen anything to switch either of them to "snap image, transfer image, clear image" with my camera, and I suspect that it is presently the same thing with yours :( -- Mark L. Kahnt, FLMI/M, ALHC, HIA, AIAA, ACS, MHP ML Kahnt New Markets Consulting Tel: (613) 531-8684 / (613) 539-0935 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]