On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:48:53 -0700 Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> provided you used only the contents of main the licensing should not be > an issue. That is the whole point of main. The only possible caveat > would be if the cd contained a package which had something like the old > apache advertising license. Looks like everything is from stable/main or testing/main with three exceptions (see below). > As for the non-US stuff this may be more complex. Where could I find out why a given package is in non-US? Specifically, I'm interesting in the following packages: gnomemeeting - stable/non-US/main - GPL libopenh323-1.7.4 - stable/non-US/main - MPL libpt-1.2.0 - stable/non-US/main - MPL I don't see anything about these packages that would require them to be in non-US, what am I missing? -- Jamin W. Collins -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
