also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.25.1147 +0200]: > > why did you prefix the subject with [SPAM] ? > > He didn't. Must be your filters ...
Not that I'd know.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.7 required=5.0
tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
and aside from that, spamassassin marks spam differently, and I have
no other filters in place.
So how would I go about to find out who's the guilty party?
It arrived at my procmail like so:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SPAM] Re: using lilo to boot from floppy image?
Folder: /home/madduck/mail/madduck/new/1035497831.32203_1.seamus
3730
So I think that he has a configuration problem. The reply I sent to
debian-user was that to the personal copy I received (despite
Mail-Followup-To), so he sends mail to me and the list in different
manners.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than to fix a system
msg08918/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
