-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've been watching the various discussions on this, and note that most experienced types think that the unstable distribution is better than the testing distribution. This leads me to one more question / observation
A few weeks ago (I don't know about now), the KDE distribution in unstable simply would not run. I've noted several of the messages recommending the unstable branch say that there were some updates that caused the receiving machines to crash / lock / not start. How does one recover from something like this short of doing a reload? For that matter, a reload should crash the same way as it's getting the same software. I may be missing something - quite likely, BTW, I'll admit total ignorance here - but it would appear that it wouldn't take many of these incidents to make the testing branch seem A LOT better than unstable. Other than this, the arguments for the unstable over testing seem valid. Thanks in advance - ---Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA1bfDjeziQOokQnARAsv1AJ9xQkN0nPkSBgSZidCMqn9XbdCTgACfWqK0 jsLHolZ6B9tOs0UN7Z7/LqM= =XfHB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----