That would definitely fit in with Microsoft�s business model of 'lets break everything so it only works with our broken implementation'
Thank the gods for Open Source and free standards. On 29 Jun 2004 at 18:58, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 11:19:42PM +0200, Joris Huizer wrote: > > > > The worst thing I know of Visual C++ is, > > > > for (int i = 0; .... ) > > ... > > ... > > ... > > for (int i = 0; .... ) > > > > won't work as the thing parses as if it's still 1990 (something like > > that) - this syntax wasn't legal once > > I have it on moderately good (but anonymous) authority that a few > years ago it was deliberate Microsoft policy for their C++ implementations > to be *in*compatible with others. I don't know whether that policy is > still in force now. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
