Monique Y. Mudama wrote: > Too bad I haven't found a filter program that comes anywhere close to > approaching the simplicity of tmda. The rules are *so freaking easy* to > implement. This is a good thing.
What about Exim's own filtering? I find that rather easy to implement yet retaining quite a bit of power. What I've seen of TMDA's filtering it is a tiny bit simpler but nowhere near as powerful. At least it isn't the Bernstienesque Procmail. *shudder* > I don't use c/r, but I do use tmda's pending-message mechanism. Instead > of challenging questionable messages, I "hold" them, which is an option > allowing me to leave them in the queue till I feel like dealing with > them. How does this differ than having them filtered into a folder for later perusal. I do that here. Anything high enough to be marked as spam but not so high it is rejected is filtered into a folder and I look at it when I'm good and ready. -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature