John Summerfield([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > S.D.A. wrote: > > >On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:01:00PM -0700 or thereabouts, Rodney D. Myers > >wrote: > > > > > > > >>Not according to Sylpheed. Both times he started new threads > >> > >> > > > >That's one of the reasons why I dropped Sylpheed early on! > > > >If one has an e-mail client that does real threading, which uses the > >message-id, > >then those messages would have appeared in thread(s), totally unrelated to > >what > >those threads were discussing. This is what happened here. > > > >Since most of the expert help on deb-user, is available from those using > >e-mail > >clients like mutt, then it behooves one to know about responding properly. > >One > >should create a new message, not hit reply and subsitute a new subject > >(that > >keeps the original message-id in the headers). > > > >The reason why they appeared differently for you, is that Sylpheed most > >likely > >only sorts by subject/date, (aka psuedo threading). > > > > > > > > This is an excellent example of what happens when some twit uses "reply" > when "compose" is appropriate. I use an email client that threads > properly, this is going to be rolled up under "Can't post to...." where > I won't see it any more.
Now all you have to do John if get them to fix the To: & Cc: problem. From: John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 23:38:35 +0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Borked e-mail threading [Was Re: HylaFax receives rubbish] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040306) :-) WT -- Hardware: The parts of a computer system that can be kicked. _______________________________________________________ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
