[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I'm working on some socket code for a project I share with someone. > > The strange thing is that the accept() call returns '0' (zero) with > no error. This of course is a invalid socket descriptor,
No, this is of course a perfectly valid file (or socket) descriptor. It is usually already open at program startup (and refers to standard input), but if it is closed somewhere in the program, it may well be reused. > Either way this is a huge bug if it is not simply the dev teams own > ignorance that is the problem (and I highly doubt that it is), and if > it is a problem it should be looked into post haste. http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#id2878006 If you want to claim that accept() is broken, despite the fact that it works perfectly for literally millions of people, you need to provide more evidence. You also didn't explain why you think that the "huge bug" is Debian specific. Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
