On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 05:13:05PM -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Monday 20 September 2004 17:07, Marc Wilson wrote: > > > Uh, that's a CUPS back-end, not the hardware directly. The port itself > > cannot consume CPU. Well, it can, but not in the sense that you mean. > > In what way do *you* think it can consume CPU? I'm not sure who *you* means, but my original thought was that the device driver associated with the port might be using a lot of CPU cycles.
So the thing reported as parallel:/dev/lpt0 (or whatever it was) is actually part of CUPS? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]