<#secure method=pgp mode=sign> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 07:28:22AM -0700, Zachary Rizer wrote: >> No. Unstable (sid) will always be unstable. Testing >> becomes the new stable, and then a new testing is born >> (etch?). > > Could you be more precise? > What is renamed, what is forked, what is cloned? Start of the cycle: Unstable forks a new testing. Testing freezes, frozen replaces testing. Frozen then replaces existing stable, which moves to the obsolete archive. > I presume that "stable" simply becomes symlinked to "sarge" instead of > "woody." Or, sarge re-symlinked to stable, IIRC... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBVMcJUzgNqloQMwcRAnBdAJ4ha+haRkrw775Pe6/SFl59qf/jDQCgyyEt qIYFILMWLfL/GLC94F/qR5w= =Jf9G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
