On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 13:53:29 -0700 (PDT), Richard Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I took a quick look at the dri troubleshooting and I couldn't find > anything specific to the Mobility series. > > The dri pages made me think, though ... should the kernel be loading > any particular modules as opposed to XFree? Looking at lsmod, I have: > > radeon > intel_agp > agpgart > > There is no drm kernel module. All of the dri, drm, glx is in the XFree > log. Is there a missing kernel module? > > Thanks, > > Richard > > > > --- Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote: > > > On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:54:10 -0700 (PDT), Richard Weil > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>What does it take to get hardware accelerated open gl working? > > > > > > > > > Try using the "radeon" driver instead of the "ati" driver and see > > what happens. > > > > I believe that the Mobility series of Radeons use an entirely > > different > > chipset, which is not understood by the DRI developers. > > > > The only feasible way (of which I know) to get DRI on the Mobility > > Radeon is to use the proprietary fglrx drivers from ATI. Just a > > warning though, their quality is lacking. > >
On your XF86Config-4 are you using "ati" or "radeon" driver? Regarding your question about kernel modules, DRI/DRM needs a kernel infrastructure and is provided by a module for your card (in your case the radeon kernel module) and a module for your chipset (in your case the intel_agp). I suppose you're using a Debian kenel image, and seems the modules are correctly loaded, anyway you can try to load the manually, i think in this order intel_agp, agpgart, radeon then start X and look with glxinfo if you have DRI working. Andrea P.S. found this on google http://www.nuclearelephant.com/papers/t30.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]