On (23/11/04 15:52), Wayne Topa wrote:
> Jacob S([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:17:29 -0500
> > Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Jacob S([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > > > On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 06:41:32 -0600
> > > > Nate Bargmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > * Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004 Nov 23 06:12 -0600]:
> > > > > > Anyway, if someone could explain or point me to a document or
> > > > > > thread(which I couldn't find) that explains why we need xprint,
> > > > > > how it fits in, and what programs it replaces, I'd appreciate
> > > > > > it.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I'm probably not alone ;-).
> > > > <snip>
> > > > > Since they still depend on xprt I've continued to use the
> > > > > mozilla.org packages.
> > > > <snip>
> > > > 
> > > > Actually, that's not true. "apt-cache show mozilla-firefox" reveals
> > > > that xprt is now only in the recommended line, instead of the
> > > > Depends line. In mozilla-browser it's in the Suggests line. I have
> > > > been following the latest Mozilla browser in Sarge while keeping
> > > > xprt and friends uninstalled. Works great, no special tricks
> > > > necessary.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Just checked and you are correct, so I uninstalled xprt*, restarted
> > > mozilla-firefox 1.0-2, brought up a page, clicked print, waited ~30
> > > seconds, clicked print, waited ~15 seconds, watched the 'preparing'
> > > message appear and the bar scroll, then firefox crashed.  The page had
> > > some jpegs on it.  Nothing was printed.
> > > 
> > > Restarted and watched the same as above on a text only page and it did
> > > print and firefox did _not_ crash.
> > > 
> > > Looks like getting firefox from mozilla is a better choice.  The
> > > current debian package has some issues.  :-)
> > 
> > Since Firefox is not my primary browser, I usually upgrade it pretty
> > fast to check out the new features and don't follow the Debian packages.
> > But I just tried installing it via apt-get to see if I experienced the
> > same problem and printing worked great for me. Pages with .jpgs, .gifs,
> > text, it didn't seem to matter - Firefox printed to cups just fine using
> > the Postscript/default option. Same with the tarball from Mozilla.org,
> > but then you already knew that.
> > 
> > Printing has been working great in Mozilla-browser and galeon for me, as
> > well. No complaints at all.
> > 
> > I'm running Sarge, btw.
> 
> It seems that the page I can't print with firefox (with or without
> xprt) prints fine with mozilla-browser.  I tried firefox with xprt and
> postscript and it continues to crash, without printing.  This is with
> with the Debian package _and_ the 1.0 version downloaded from
> mozilla.org.  A bug report to mozilla.org was submitted.
> 
> The page is one of mine and I thought it was odd that I had printed
> copies of it but could not print it with firefox.
> 
> http://www.capital.net/~brittman/puppypic/puppies.html
> for those that might want to try it for themselves.
It prints fine here on sid (firefox 1.0) ps/cups

Regards

Clive

-- 
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...strategies for business



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to