On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:01:27AM +1300, Greg Trounson wrote: > Wayne Topa wrote: > >Thomas H. George([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > Just made a new .sxw file, saved it, exited OO. Restarted OO and > > printed the file. No problem here. > > > >ii openoffice.org 1.1.2dfsg1-1 high-quality office productivity suite > >ii openoffice.org 1.1.2dfsg1-1 OpenOffice.org office suite binary files > >ii openoffice.org 1.1.2-5+1 Debian specific parts of OpenOffice.org > >ii openoffice.org 1.1+20030814-3 OpenOffice.org office suite help > >(English) > >ii openoffice.org 1.1.2dfsg1-1 English (US) language package for > >OpenOffice > > > > Did that just say openoffice.org 1.1.2, in testing? Why such an old > version? What happened to 1.1.3?
1.1.3 is still stuck in experimental, the debian-openoffice has I think been working pretty hard on perfecting 1.1.2 for sarge. matt -------------------------- .''`. Matt Price : :' : Debian User `. `'` & hemi-geek `- -------------------------- if you're an evil spambot, these addresses are for you: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]